Educating the Public on Evidence-based methods for improving inter-group civility.

Posts Tagged studies Kills Comments

How much pure democracy can science stand? has closed its comments section for most articles because:

…even a fractious minority wields enough power to skew a reader's perception of a story, recent research suggests

They cite a U of Wisconsin-Madison study that showed:

Uncivil comments not only polarized readers, but they often changed a participant's interpretation of the news story itselfThose exposed to rude comments…ended up with a much more polarized understanding.

And then PopSci gets more polemical:

A politically motivated, decades-long war on expertise has eroded the popular consensus on a wide variety of scientifically validated topics. Everything, from evolution to the origins of climate change, is mistakenly up for grabs again.

So a civil non-fractious majority must be protected from an uncivil fractious minority? This because the non-fracts are so easily swayed by non-facts from the fracts. Which injects the paternalism question into the civility debate. .(Cf. this David Brooks piece in which he makes the case for “social paternalism”).

At any rate the question of whether the internet has been bad for democracy continues…

Read Ahead

Partisans Can’t Count

I’m guessing most readers of Orwell’s 1984 are disturbed when Winston Smith is tortured into believing 2+2=5.  Well most readers, prepare to meet your inner O’Brien, instigator of tortured reasoning:  In this piece Chris Mooney reports on Dan M. Kahan’s recent study which found that when the subject shifts from skin cream to gun control:

…people who are otherwise very good at math may totally flunk a problem that they would otherwise probably be able to solve, simply because giving the right answer goes against their political beliefs

Participants with superior math skills were even more prone to selecting the wrong answer when the right answer went against their politics. All this being quite consistent with so much recent research revealing that as things get personal our "reasoning" is mostly rationalized self-interest rather than honest truth-seeking… and that so-called smart people are just better at rationalizing their self-interest.

See more on Kahan's work at the Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School

See also Marty Kaplan's piece on the Kahan study in Salon, which includes a brief rundown on the work of Brendan Nyhan, whom Kaplan denominates his "go-to source for downer studies of how our hard-wiring makes democracy hopeless."

That should cheer you up…

Read Ahead
Our goal is to educate the public about social science research on improving inter-group relations across moral divides.